# 🔗 A history of definitions of powerful AI

- Author: @gurupanguji
- Date: 2025-04-22
- URL: https://gurupanguji.com/blog/2025/04/22/a-history-of-definitions-of-powerful-ai/
- Categories: link, ai
- Tags: agi, computing, hlmi, llm, ml, technology

---


<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><a href="https://define-agi.com">https://define-agi.com</a></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><a href="https://jasmi.news/p/agi?ref=gurupanguji.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="">@jasmine</a> has a great blog on the quest to determine the definition of agi. It continues its streak to have a lot of definitions but none a majority agree on. No matter how you cut it, the definition encompasses some version of "vastness." As a result, it can act as a powerful motivator in an organization. It lets the lab workers (employees? researchers?) attribute their own hazy version of the vision on to it. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>That said, one of the setup paragraphs made me lol</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

> I brought my questions to a friend, who shrugged it off as semantic. “We’ll know AGI when we see it,” he said. “It’s like that court case about obscenity.” I asked an AI engineer I knew the same question, but he replied that answering was impossible: “It’s like asking when aliens will land on earth.” I’m surprised at their confidence in porn and aliens, to be honest; if we still can’t settle disputes about nipples and UFOs, how do we expect to agree on the nature of intelligence itself?

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Jasmine touches upon their perspective on what "agi" stands for</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

> I think “AGI” is better understood through the lenses of faith, field-building, and ingroup signaling than as a concrete technical milestone. AGI represents an ambition and an aspiration; a Schelling point, a shibboleth.

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>I particularly resonate with how they claim "agi" will be unleashed to the world</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

> Some company will declare that it reached AGI first, maybe an upstart trying to make a splash or raise a round, maybe after acing a slate of benchmarks. We’ll all argue on Twitter over whether it counts, and the argument will be fiercer if the model is internal-only and/or not open-weights. Regulators will take a second look. Enterprise software will be sold. All the while, the outside world will look basically the same as the day before.[7](https://jasmi.news/p/agi?__readwiseLocation=&ref=birchtree.me#footnote-7-161039486)

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>before heading to a practical approach to dealing with AI</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

> And like with climate change, we ought to frame AI progress not as a binary of safe/unsafe or AGI/not-AGI, but as a [jagged frontier](https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/centaurs-and-cyborgs-on-the-jagged) of capabilities with risks that depend on where you’re looking.[9](https://jasmi.news/p/agi?__readwiseLocation=&ref=birchtree.me#footnote-9-161039486) AI discovered wholly new proteins before it could count the ‘r’s in ‘strawberry’, which makes it neither vaporware nor a demigod but a secret third thing.

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
