Pithy thoughts on thinking by dustin curtis

I have been stuck. Every time I sit down to write a blog post, code a feature, or start a project, I come to the same realization: in the context of AI, what I’m doing is a waste of time. It’s horrifying. The fun has been sucked out of the process of creation because nothing I make organically can compete with what AI already produces—or soon will. All of my original thoughts feel like early drafts of better, more complete thoughts that simply haven’t yet formed inside an LLM.

Original post: gurupanguji.com

The luxury of saying no…

The real threat to creativity isn’t a language model. It’s a workplace that rewards speed over depth, scale over care, automation over meaning. If we’re going to talk about what robs people of agency, let’s start there. Let’s talk about the economic structures that pressure people into using tools badly, or in ways that betray their values. Let’s talk about the lack of time, support, mentorship, and trust. Not the fact that someone ran a prompt through a chatbot to get unstuck. Where is the empathy? Where is your support for people who are being tossed into the pit of AI and instructed to find a way to make it work? How is the view from your ivory tower?

Original post: gurupanguji.com

Fast charge notification for iOS and Watch OS

watchOS: Fast Charging Indication The Apple Watch Ultra’s battery life is fantastic. It has transformed the way I use my Apple Watch while out on long wilderness hikes. The small downside to this amazing capacity is that charging the battery up can take a very long time, especially if you aren’t doing a ā€˜fast charge’.

Original post: gurupanguji.com

Untitled

Brickman & Campbell (1971) called this puzzle the Hedonic Treadmill: as a person experiences a positive emotional event, expectations and desires rise in tandem which cancels their net long-term impact, resulting in no permanent gain in happiness.

So no matter how hard one tries to gain in happiness, one will remain in the same place.

Original post: gurupanguji.com

Calling Arc out.

And let’s not forget: they weren’t even making a fucking browser. They were making a fancy chromium skin. Because the role of a browser, at its core, is to make network requests, parse HTML, render CSS, and run JS. They weren’t interested in taking care of those things. They were happy to let other people do that work which, for a company called ā€œThe Browser Companyā€ that thinks that:

the browser is the most important software in your life — and it wasn’t getting the attention it deserved

Is quite telling. And in the blog post, he even tried to gaslight everyone by saying ā€œThat’s why most browsers don’t dare to try new things. It’s too costly. Too complex to break from Chromeā€. If that’s the case Josh then explain to me why a project like Ladybird is managing to make progress in precisely that direction with probably a fraction of the manpower and financial resources you had.

Original post: gurupanguji.com